SECTOR COMPARISON · SINGLE SCOPE
Compare documented profiles
Two organizations in the same sector and category. Sources are available for each fact. Missing evidence must never be treated as zero or as proof of real-world absence.
Pilote : MONIFACT Funding Intelligence. This comparison is neither a score, ranking nor legal-entity matching.
Choisir deux dossiers
Dossier A : EUREQUA · Organization
Dossier B : 1 DES SI · Organization
Results are limited to 24 profiles per query. After the first choice, only entities in the same category are offered.
104 CENT QUATRE
Remplacer le dossier B →1.2.3. ARCHITECTE
Remplacer le dossier B →124.SERVICES
Remplacer le dossier B →1331
Remplacer le dossier B →13E SENS
Remplacer le dossier B →15 38 RESEAU MED
Remplacer le dossier B →1 DES SI
Remplacer le dossier B →1D-LAB
Remplacer le dossier B →205 CORP
Remplacer le dossier B →20 MINUTES FRANCE
Remplacer le dossier B →23CHEMIN
Remplacer le dossier B →26000 COUVERTS
Remplacer le dossier B →2L
Remplacer le dossier B →32AOUT
Remplacer le dossier B →369 EDITIONS
Remplacer le dossier B →379
Remplacer le dossier B →3ANGLES
Remplacer le dossier B →3 DFM
Remplacer le dossier B →3F RESIDENCES
Remplacer le dossier B →3 S : SEJOUR SPORTIF SOLIDAIRE
Remplacer le dossier B →40MCUBE
Remplacer le dossier B →44
Remplacer le dossier B →47-49
Remplacer le dossier B →Diagnostic de couverture documentaire
These figures describe observations published in MONIFACT, pas not the size, performance, solvency or actual quality of the organizations. Absence from this dataset never proves real-world absence.
EUREQUA
3 faits revieweds in the public selection · 1 source distincte linked to these facts.
Latest recorded observation date in the selection: 02/10/2026. This is not necessarily the source publication date.
Classification of reviewed observations
- Official : 3 faits
Most frequent source publishers
- Direction interministérielle du numérique · Annuaire des Entreprises : 3 faits linkeds
These are documentary frequencies, not a measure of credibility or exhaustive coverage.
1 DES SI
3 faits revieweds in the public selection · 1 source distincte linked to these facts.
Latest recorded observation date in the selection: 05/10/2026. This is not necessarily the source publication date.
Classification of reviewed observations
- Official : 3 faits
Most frequent source publishers
- Direction interministérielle du numérique · Annuaire des Entreprises : 3 faits linkeds
These are documentary frequencies, not a measure of credibility or exhaustive coverage.
Observed and verifiable indicators
The figures below are observed records, not ratios directly comparable between companies. Different sources, roles or periods prevent any conclusion about relative performance.
EUREQUA
57 lignes as resolved recipient · 0 lignes as resolved funder · 1 source.
Bénéficiaire · Subvention publique · period 2025-12-31
Montant source : 900 EUR.
Métropole de Lyon · Subventions de la Métropole de Lyon
Lire la preuve de ce financement →Bénéficiaire · Subvention publique · period 2025-06-20
Montant source : 2100 EUR.
Métropole de Lyon · Subventions de la Métropole de Lyon
Lire la preuve de ce financement →Bénéficiaire · Subvention publique · period 2025-09-03
Montant source : 1350 EUR.
Métropole de Lyon · Subventions de la Métropole de Lyon
Lire la preuve de ce financement →Bénéficiaire · Subvention publique · period 2024-06-28
Montant source : 3150 EUR.
Métropole de Lyon · Subventions de la Métropole de Lyon
Lire la preuve de ce financement →Bénéficiaire · Subvention publique · period 2024-07-04
Montant source : 2880.90 EUR.
Métropole de Lyon · Subventions de la Métropole de Lyon
Lire la preuve de ce financement →Preview limited: see the profile for other records.
1 DES SI
1 ligne as resolved recipient · 0 lignes as resolved funder · 1 source.
Bénéficiaire · Subvention publique · period 2019
Montant source : 10000 EUR.
Ministère de la Culture · Données essentielles des conventions de subvention · Ministère de la Culture
Lire la preuve de ce financement →Rubriques documentaires communes
Matching labels in two profiles make their sources easier to read. A shared heading does not make values economically comparable. Only unique labels from each side are shown; ambiguous duplicates are excluded.
| Published heading | EUREQUA | 1 DES SI |
|---|---|---|
| Appartenance ESS officielle | O Official Preuve A → |
O Official Preuve B → |
| Forme juridique officielle | Catégorie juridique INSEE 9220 Official Preuve A → |
Catégorie juridique INSEE 9220 Official Preuve B → |
| Identité associative officielle | EUREQUA Official Preuve A → |
1 DES SI Official Preuve B → |
Documented dataset coverage
EUREQUA
Category: Organization · 1 source in the profile.
The lists below are limited to the first published claims; consult the full profile for all observations.
Identité associative officielle · Official
EUREQUA
Direction interministérielle du numérique · Annuaire des Entreprises · observation 02/10/2026
Forme juridique officielle · Official
Catégorie juridique INSEE 9220
Direction interministérielle du numérique · Annuaire des Entreprises · observation 02/10/2026
Appartenance ESS officielle · Official
O
Direction interministérielle du numérique · Annuaire des Entreprises · observation 02/10/2026
1 DES SI
Category: Organization · 1 source in the profile.
The lists below are limited to the first published claims; consult the full profile for all observations.
Identité associative officielle · Official
1 DES SI
Direction interministérielle du numérique · Annuaire des Entreprises · observation 05/10/2026
Forme juridique officielle · Official
Catégorie juridique INSEE 9220
Direction interministérielle du numérique · Annuaire des Entreprises · observation 05/10/2026
Appartenance ESS officielle · Official
O
Direction interministérielle du numérique · Annuaire des Entreprises · observation 05/10/2026
Funding published for the same period
Il s'agit de distinct records from the same dataset, with the same recorded type, role, currency and declared financial year. They prove neither that the aid served the same purpose nor that the financial or contractual scope was identical. These observations are therefore not strictly comparable economic measures.
The documentary sample is truncated: matching is not attempted without reviewing the full dataset, as duplicates may exist outside the preview.
No pair of individual observations qualifies under the stated criteria. Funding may exist outside this selection or without a verified currency.
Mesures strictement comparables
A metric appears in this table only when its type, unit, currency, period and scope match exactly across the two profiles. Amounts are not added or converted. Differences are not calculated automatically.
Economic metrics reviewed: 0 for EUREQUA, 0 for 1 DES SI. Complete keys: 0 et 0. Incomplete keys: 0 et 0. Ambiguous shared keys: 0.
No strictly comparable metric is established between these profiles in the published observations. Their information remains available separately; this does not prove an absence of economic data.